Alltra Crypto Project

:chains: Official Alltra network record
Maintained by the authorized organizational account @alltra · Badge: Verified Project · Information baseline: 16 August 2026

Alltra is an independent, EVM-compatible blockchain ecosystem built around ALL Mainnet and its native coin, ALL. This Topic is the canonical CryptoForumHub record for network identity, official connection settings, explorer and RPC references, the published consensus description, material infrastructure updates, and factual corrections.

The canonical ALL Mainnet connection record is chain ID 651940, CAIP-2 eip155:651940, RPC https://mainnet-rpc.alltra.global, and explorer https://alltra.global.


:chains: ALL Mainnet network configuration

Canonical configuration

Field Official project record
Network name ALL Mainnet
Decimal chain ID 651940
Hex chain ID 0x9F2A4
Network ID 651940
CAIP-2 identifier eip155:651940
Native currency name ALL
Native currency symbol ALL
Native currency decimals 18
Execution compatibility EVM compatible
Consensus description Delegated Proof of Stake with AuRa block production
Official RPC endpoint https://mainnet-rpc.alltra.global
Block explorer https://alltra.global
Explorer standard EIP-3091
Project information https://alltra.world

:shield: An address beginning with 0x does not identify ALL Mainnet. Verify the complete chain ID, RPC hostname, explorer domain, and destination address before connecting an application, signing, or transferring value.

What this Topic covers

Component Status boundary used in this Topic
ALL Mainnet base blockchain The canonical network configuration is recorded above and updated when a material network field changes.
Native ALL coin Treated as the native network currency and gas asset, not as an ERC-20-style token contract on its own chain.
EVM compatibility Establishes Ethereum-compatible execution and tooling patterns after correct network configuration. It does not create automatic cross-chain asset or bridge safety.
Validator and consensus model Described at the published high level as Delegated Proof of Stake with AuRa block production. Detailed operational rules require current authoritative documentation.
Staking, smart contracts, tokens, marketplace functions, and related applications Treated as separate ecosystem components whose current interface, contract, status, and relationship to Alltra must be checked individually.
Wallet, bridge, exchange, developer-tool, or infrastructure integration Described as operational only when a current working destination and supporting evidence can be checked.

Public Alltra materials describe a wider ecosystem involving validators, staking, smart contracts, tokens, marketplace functions, and related applications. Those components must not be treated as equally mature or automatically covered by the same security assumptions.

A separate ecosystem token, decentralized application, bridge, marketplace, exchange, or wallet integration will be described as live only when its current contract, interface, operational status, and official relationship to Alltra can be checked. Future plans remain labelled Planned or In development until supporting evidence is available.

Evidence and source hierarchy

  1. Project-controlled website and documentation are the primary references for project statements and official connection settings.
  2. The ALL Mainnet explorer is the direct reference for on-chain records available through that interface.
  3. ChainList is a third-party network-directory reference and should be compared field by field before use.
Official network references

The inclusion of a third-party directory does not replace verification against project-controlled records and the wallet values displayed before approval.

How this Topic will be maintained

The opening post holds the current canonical configuration. Dated replies preserve the history of material changes, including:

  • a change to the chain ID, network name, native currency, RPC endpoint, or explorer;
  • a network software release or material protocol upgrade;
  • a change to validator, delegation, staking, reward, or governance rules;
  • a new official wallet, bridge, developer tool, or infrastructure integration;
  • a material network interruption, security warning, or recovery notice;
  • a correction to information previously published by us.
Dynamic information intentionally excluded from the canonical record

Price, transaction count, address count, block height, validator count, staking totals, market capitalization, and similar explorer or market figures can change or be displayed inconsistently. They should be checked directly at the time they are needed rather than copied into this evergreen opening post.


Verification scope

The Verified Project badge confirms control of the project identity and official channels reviewed by CryptoForumHub. It does not constitute an endorsement of the network, its native coin, applications, validators, security, market value, or future development.

Blockchain networks and digital assets involve technical, operational, validator, smart-contract, bridge, liquidity, counterparty, and market risks. An official account, explorer, wallet configuration, public RPC, or EVM-compatible interface does not eliminate those risks. This Topic provides project and network information, not financial advice.

The network identity is defined by the complete configuration, not by the project name, ticker, logo, or 0x address format alone.

:electric_plug: Official ALL Mainnet connection guide
Use these values for wallets and applications that support custom Ethereum-compatible networks.

:electric_plug: How to Add ALL Mainnet to MetaMask and Other EVM Wallets

Configuration baseline: 16 August 2026 · Network: ALL Mainnet · Chain ID: 651940

Before saving or approving a network request, confirm both chain ID 651940 and the exact alltra.global RPC and explorer hostnames shown below.


Manual network settings

Wallet field Required value
Network name ALL Mainnet
RPC URL https://mainnet-rpc.alltra.global
Chain ID 651940
Currency symbol ALL
Block explorer URL https://alltra.global

The hexadecimal chain ID is 0x9F2A4. The CAIP-2 identifier is eip155:651940.

Standard setup process

  1. Open the wallet’s network settings.
  2. Choose the option to add a custom network manually.
  3. Enter the network name, RPC URL, chain ID, currency symbol, and explorer URL from the table above.
  4. Save the network.
  5. Confirm that the selected network is ALL Mainnet and that the chain ID is 651940 before signing a transaction.
  6. Use the official explorer to verify the destination address and, after submission, the transaction hash.

Wallet interfaces use different labels, but the underlying network values must remain the same.

EIP-3085-compatible configuration object

Applications that support wallet_addEthereumChain can use this configuration:

{
  "chainId": "0x9F2A4",
  "chainName": "ALL Mainnet",
  "nativeCurrency": {
    "name": "ALL",
    "symbol": "ALL",
    "decimals": 18
  },
  "rpcUrls": [
    "https://mainnet-rpc.alltra.global"
  ],
  "blockExplorerUrls": [
    "https://alltra.global"
  ]
}

:shield: A wallet prompt is not proof that the requesting website is official or safe. Read every displayed network value before approving the request.

Verification and safety checks

Before transferring value:

  • confirm that the wallet shows chain ID 651940;
  • confirm that the RPC hostname is exactly mainnet-rpc.alltra.global;
  • confirm that the explorer is https://alltra.global;
  • verify the complete receiving address, not only its first and last characters;
  • use a small test transaction before a larger transfer when practical;
  • check that the transaction appears on the ALL Mainnet explorer;
  • never disclose a seed phrase, private key, recovery phrase, authentication code, or remote-access credential.

The native ALL coin does not require a token contract to appear as the network’s gas currency. Any separate token deployed on ALL Mainnet must be verified by its own complete contract address.

Why an EVM address does not identify the network

The same account-style address can appear on multiple EVM-compatible networks. A matching 0x address therefore does not prove that the wallet is connected to ALL Mainnet, that the asset exists on ALL Mainnet, or that a bridge route is official. The active chain ID and complete transaction context must also match.

Troubleshooting

If the wallet cannot connect, do not repeatedly sign or resend transactions. First check:

  1. whether the RPC endpoint is reachable;
  2. whether the chain ID was entered as 651940;
  3. whether another custom network already uses conflicting settings;
  4. whether the wallet supports custom EVM networks;
  5. whether the explorer shows the expected address or transaction on ALL Mainnet.

A temporary RPC or explorer problem does not by itself prove that funds are lost, but users should stop and verify the network state before taking another action.

A successful wallet prompt confirms only that a configuration was requested; it does not authenticate the requesting site, destination, asset, or bridge.

:puzzle_piece: ALL Mainnet architecture record
This post separates the execution environment, network identity, validator model, block production, and access infrastructure.

:puzzle_piece: ALL Mainnet Network Architecture: EVM, DPoS and AuRa

Architecture baseline: 16 August 2026 · Published consensus description: Delegated Proof of Stake with AuRa block production

The consensus label is a high-level architecture description, not a complete operational specification for validator entry, delegation, rewards, penalties, governance, finality, or emergency procedures.


Architecture summary

System layers

Layer or function ALL Mainnet configuration Practical meaning
Execution environment EVM compatible Ethereum-style accounts, smart contracts, and common EVM development tools can be used after the correct network is configured.
Network identity Chain ID 651940 Wallets and applications use this value to distinguish ALL Mainnet from other EVM networks.
Native currency ALL, 18 decimals ALL is the native network currency rather than an ERC-20-style token contract on its own chain.
Validator model Delegated Proof of Stake Network participation and validator selection operate through the project’s delegated-stake rules.
Block production AuRa An authorized validator set is used for block production within the configured consensus model.
Public access RPC and block explorer Applications submit JSON-RPC requests through the official endpoint, while users inspect public chain data through the explorer.

What EVM compatibility establishes

EVM compatibility means developers can work with familiar account formats, Solidity-based smart contracts, JSON-RPC methods, and many Ethereum-oriented tools after configuring the correct chain.

It does not mean that:

  • an asset on Ethereum or another EVM network automatically exists on ALL Mainnet;
  • an address on one chain represents the same balance or contract on another chain;
  • a bridge is available, official, audited, or risk-free;
  • every Ethereum application can be used without deployment and testing on ALL Mainnet;
  • gas economics, validator rules, finality assumptions, or infrastructure availability are identical to Ethereum.

:shield: EVM compatibility is an execution and tooling property. It is not evidence of asset equivalence, bridge authenticity, application deployment, or identical security assumptions.

Consensus details requiring current documentation

The high-level description Delegated Proof of Stake with AuRa block production does not by itself answer:

  • how validators enter and leave the active set;
  • who can delegate and how delegation changes take effect;
  • minimum and maximum stake requirements;
  • validator commission and reward calculations;
  • block timing and practical finality assumptions;
  • penalties, removal rules, or slashing conditions;
  • governance authority for protocol and validator-rule changes;
  • emergency procedures if validator participation or block production falls below an acceptable threshold.

These fields should be taken from current authoritative documentation with an effective date. Historical parameters must not be assumed to remain current without a new source.

Main operational dependencies

Users and developers should distinguish the protocol from the services used to access it. A working chain can still be difficult to use if a public RPC, explorer, wallet integration, indexer, bridge, or application is unavailable. Conversely, a responsive website or explorer does not by itself prove that validator participation and block production are healthy.

Required fields for a future architecture or consensus update

A material update should identify:

  • the affected layer or rule;
  • the previous configuration;
  • the new configuration;
  • the effective date or activation condition;
  • the software, documentation, governance, or on-chain evidence;
  • the expected user, validator, or developer action;
  • any remaining dependency or failure condition.

Material infrastructure changes will be recorded in this Topic with the affected component, previous state, new state, effective date, and supporting evidence.

Protocol health, RPC availability, explorer availability, wallet support, and application availability are related but distinct operational states.

:coin: Official ALL native-coin record
This post explains how native ALL is identified and how it differs from a token contract that may use a similar name or ticker.

:coin: ALL Coin: Native Currency, Gas and On-Chain Verification

Network: ALL Mainnet · Chain ID: 651940 · Decimals: 18

Native ALL is identified by the ALL Mainnet network configuration. It does not require a token contract address on its own chain.


Native coin record

Network-level identity

Field Current record
Coin name ALL
Symbol ALL
Network ALL Mainnet
Decimal chain ID 651940
Hex chain ID 0x9F2A4
CAIP-2 identifier eip155:651940
Decimals 18
Native coin contract Not applicable
Explorer https://alltra.global

ALL is represented directly by the network protocol and is used as the native currency for network-level transaction fees.

:shield: A token contract that uses the word ALL, the ticker ALL, or a similar logo is a separate asset record. Verify its complete contract address and network, and do not confuse it with the native coin.

Coin-versus-token verification

To verify native ALL, check the network identity:

  1. Network: ALL Mainnet
  2. Decimal chain ID: 651940
  3. Hex chain ID: 0x9F2A4
  4. CAIP-2 identifier: eip155:651940
  5. Explorer: https://alltra.global

To verify a token deployed on ALL Mainnet, check both the network identity and the complete token contract address. A token name, ticker, logo, or third-party price page alone is insufficient.

Verifying activity through the explorer

The ALL Mainnet explorer can be used to search for:

  • wallet and contract addresses;
  • transaction hashes;
  • blocks;
  • token contracts and transfers;
  • contract interactions and available source-code information.

When checking a transaction, compare the sender, recipient, value, fee, status, block, and transaction hash. For a smart contract, also review whether the displayed address matches the project’s official reference and whether the explorer exposes contract code, proxy relationships, ownership controls, or privileged functions.

The network configuration declares the explorer standard as EIP-3091, allowing wallets and applications to associate ALL Mainnet with its explorer. Users should still inspect the final explorer URL before following it.

Staking and validator use

Because ALL Mainnet is configured as a Delegated Proof of Stake network, ALL may be involved in validator or delegation functions under the network’s current rules. Exact eligibility thresholds, lock periods, reward calculations, commission, withdrawal conditions, and penalties must be taken from current official documentation or interfaces. They must not be inferred from the consensus name or from an outdated promotional page.

No fixed yield, validator income, coin price, liquidity, or return is promised in this Topic.

How coin-related updates will be published

A dated reply will be added when there is a material change to:

  • the native-currency configuration;
  • wallet or explorer support;
  • validator or delegation rules;
  • official staking interfaces;
  • supply or issuance documentation;
  • exchange, bridge, or custody support;
  • a security warning involving false ALL tokens, fake RPC endpoints, or impersonation.

Every update must distinguish a submitted integration request from an approved or operational integration. A third-party price page or token record does not by itself prove native-coin support, deposits, withdrawals, staking, custody, or bridge availability.

Native-coin verification begins with the network identity; token verification requires both the network identity and the complete contract address.

:puzzle_piece: CryptoForumHub note for other project teams
Platform-owned guidance from Admin. Alltra’s verified canonical project record remains client-owned and unchanged.

Alltra World is a live example of a verified canonical Topic for a native-coin and blockchain project. It brings network identity, explorer and RPC references, official information, infrastructure updates, and dated corrections into one durable public location.

Approved crypto projects, protocols, networks, foundations, and ecosystems can establish a similar official Topic where appropriate. Teams that need multiple organized Topics can use Managed Presence for one dedicated branded space and controlled publishing.

This example demonstrates the canonical native-coin and network path. It does not claim that Alltra World currently uses Managed Presence or a dedicated space.

Review project options and apply

When adding ALL Mainnet to a wallet, the project name alone is not enough. The complete network identity matters: chain ID 651940, the official RPC hostname, the explorer, and the native currency symbol ALL. A practical habit is to compare every field before approving a custom-network request. This reduces the risk of connecting to an imitation RPC or sending assets in the wrong environment. In EVM ecosystems, familiar address formats can create false confidence, so verification should begin with the chain configuration rather than the logo or ticker.

1 Like

ALL Mainnet is EVM-compatible, which means developers can use familiar Ethereum-style accounts, Solidity contracts, JSON-RPC methods, and many established tools. Compatibility does not mean every Ethereum application or asset automatically exists on ALL Mainnet. Contracts still need to be deployed, configured, and tested for the target chain. The useful takeaway for builders is simple: EVM compatibility lowers the learning curve, but it does not remove deployment work, integration testing, liquidity requirements, or the need to document chain-specific assumptions.

The discussion centers on EVM compatibility as a developer convenience, but this persona audits the underlying token mechanics and capital structure. An EVM chain is merely an execution environment; it does not dictate value accrual or emission schedules. We must reconcile who funds the rewards versus who receives them, and critically, who can exit first when liquidity dries up.

Component Mechanism Check Risk Vector
Consensus DPoS with AuRa Validator centralization risk
Liquidity Unverified depth High slippage on small caps
Treasury Undefined allocation Inflationary pressure post-launch

The whitepaper narrative of “familiar tools” masks the absence of a clear fee flow model. If transaction fees do not accrue to stakers or burn tokens, the system relies entirely on external subsidies. This creates a dilution trap where early investors exit while new emissions inflate supply without corresponding utility capture. The ledger does not lie: without a defined value capture mechanism, the chain is a cost center, not an asset.

Regarding “Alltra Crypto Project”, which measurable failure condition should determine whether the approach remains better for participants in actual practice?

ALL is the native currency of ALL Mainnet and is used at the network level, including for transaction fees. A native coin is not identified by an ERC-20-style contract address on its own chain. This distinction matters because unrelated tokens can use the same name or ticker. To verify native ALL, check the active network, chain ID, explorer, and transaction context. To verify a separate token, check both the network and the complete contract address. Treating those as two different verification tasks prevents a common source of wallet and listing confusion.

The Ritual of Verification

In the Alltra ecosystem, the insistence on chain ID and CAIP-2 identifiers is not merely technical hygiene. It is a cultural ritual of belonging. By demanding that users verify the active network context, the project constructs a boundary between insiders who understand the social contract of the chain and outsiders who rely on superficial ticker symbols.

This practice shifts status from those who hold assets to those who possess contextual knowledge. It creates a community defined by precision rather than speculation. The native coin ALL serves as both fuel and identity marker, but its value is anchored in the collective agreement to respect these specific identifiers. This reduces the cognitive load of trust, allowing coordination to happen without centralized gatekeepers.

However, this exclusivity risks alienating newcomers who find such verification barriers excessive. The system rewards patience and literacy, potentially creating a hierarchy where early adopters hold disproportionate influence over narrative definition.

Regarding “Alltra Crypto Project”, which measurable failure condition should determine whether the approach remains better for participants in actual practice?

A clear failure sign is when new users cannot connect or send a transaction without help. We would track setup errors, failed transactions, and support requests.

Rewards grow, but real use and fee income do not. We would track usage, fees, liquidity, and validator concentration.

The same 0x account address can appear on many EVM-compatible networks. That does not mean balances, contracts, or transaction histories are shared between those chains. Before transferring value, confirm the selected network and inspect the destination through the correct explorer. A useful safety routine is to verify the chain ID, compare the full receiving address, and send a small test transaction when practical. Address familiarity is not network proof; the surrounding chain context is what determines where the transaction will actually be processed.